Mini-Symposium: Esophageal Atresia and Tracheo-esophageal FistulaSurgical Treatment of Tracheobronchomalacia: A novel approach
Section snippets
INTRODUCTION
TBM and EDAC may coexist in patients with a combined pathological phenotype resulting in both acute and chronic respiratory illnesses. [1], [2], [3] Severe TBM has typically been characterized by coaptation of the airways with anterior and posterior collapse during exhalation in spontaneously breathing patients. [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] In the pediatric population, both TBM and EDAC are often underdiagnosed in patients with airflow limitations and pediatric
Histopathological evaluation
Given the heterogeneity of populations with TBM and EDAC and the lack of knowledge regarding the overall prevalence of this disease, it is likely the numbers are underreported. The histopathological studies that have been performed postmortem have tended to group both TBM and EDAC together; however, they may represent different functional entities and represent both a dynamic component (EDAC) and a static component (TBM) and may also have associated concurrent problems with asthma and/or
MULTIDISCPLINARY TEAM
The impetus for development of the severity score for tracheobronchomalacia was to help provide a standard for communication amongst providers, guide surgeons and providers with a more precise description of the individual patient's anatomy, guide surgical planning, and assess postoperative results. The patients are best cared for under the aegis of a multidisciplinary team with expertise across all disciplines for this cadre of often complicated patients. Our multidisciplinary team consists of
Endoscopic Evaluation
Pre and post-operative bronchoscopies were performed and video recorded by the primary surgeons involved. Anatomic regions were evaluated in a standardized fashion. [18] In brief, the trachea was evaluated by anatomical region and severity of collapse. Anatomic regions were further classified into upper, middle, and lower trachea; and, right and left main stem bronchus. The patient was evaluated during gentle respiration along with vigorous active breathing following both diaphragmatic and
Surgical Technique
Primarily endoscopic exams and preoperative imaging guided the type of tracheobronchopexy performed and the surgeon determined the approach. Individualized surgical plans were based on the findings and expected results. Generally patients with associated esophageal disease underwent primary right posterior thoracotomy while those with cardiac disease underwent sternotomy. For those with multiple disease entities present, surgeons favored addressing all concerns during one operative case,
TREATMENT RESULTS AND POSTOPERATIVE EVALUATION
A representative sample of forty-eight patients were identified and treated at our institution over the past 3-year time-period. Thirty patients had concurrent pre-operative and post-operative bronchoscopies available with standardized scoring of all 6 regions of the trachea (T1, T2, T3, Carina, and Right and Left main stem Bronchi). Of the patients studied, 73% had an associated EA/TEF, 53% had CHD and 33% had both entities present. Median age at time of surgery was 8 months (range: 1-72
DISCUSSION
Overall, our current series of patients, who underwent direct anterior and/or posterior tracheobronchopexy for severe TBM with the development of a concurrent prospective grading scale to ascertain correlation between surgery, symptoms, and effectiveness on particular tracheal-bronchial segments, have done well. As there is currently no standardized grading score for pediatric TBM and EDAC, we recommend an overall grading score that incorporates symptoms with improvement given their surgical
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE STUDIES
A standardized approach, a novel grading scale, and a holistic team reduces the severity of TBM and EDAC. Clinical effectiveness was seen by the reduction of severity of symptoms as correlated to all segments of the airway. Our small series has shown that the use of direct tracheobronchopexy, or 2-stage operations for severe TBM and EDAC, has resulted in resolution of ALTEs and significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent pneumonias and use of supplemental oxygen. Given the heterogeneity of
EDUCATIONAL AIMS
The reader will be able to:
- •
Describe the constellation of conditions associated with tracheobronchomalacia (TBM) and excessive dynamic airway collapse (EDAC)
- •
Identify the differences seen in upper airway obstruction versus lower airway obstruction
- •
Describe the adjunctive modalities utilized to determine the best surgical approach in a particular patient
- •
Describe the various surgical therapies for tracheobronchomalacia with their associated advantages and disadvantages
References (28)
- et al.
Surgical approaches to aortopexy for severe tracheomalacia
J Pediatr Surg
(2014) - et al.
Aortic suspension (aortopexy) for severe tracheomalacia in infants and children
Am J Surg
(2002) - et al.
Contemporary surgery of tracheomalacia
J Pediatr Surg
(1986) - et al.
The role of aortopexy in severe tracheomalacia
J Pediatr Surg
(2006) - et al.
Tracheomalacia and tracheobronchomalacia in children and adults: an in-depth review
Chest
(2005) - et al.
Severe tracheomalacia associated with esophageal atresia: results of surgical treatment
J Pediatric Surg
(1992) - et al.
Tracheobronchomalacia in pediatric patients with esophageal atresia: comparison of diagnostic laryngoscopy /bronchoscopy and dynamic airway multi-detector computed tomography
J Pediatr Surg
(2015) - et al.
Acquired tracheomalacia: etiology and differential diagnosis
Chest
(1975) - et al.
Tracheomalacia and bronchomalacia in children: incidence and patient characteristics
Chest
(2005) Left mainstem bronchopexy for severe bronchomalacia
J Pediatr Surg
(1991)